PNG or WebP? Compare compression, transparency, browser support and real-world file sizes — and learn exactly when each format wins.
Choosing between PNG and WebP is one of the most common image decisions on the web — and the right answer depends on what the image is for. This guide compares both formats with real numbers so you can decide in seconds.
Quick answer
- Converting for a website or app? → WebP. It is 25–35% smaller at the same visual quality, and every modern browser supports it.
- Editing later or need pixel-perfect quality? → PNG. It is lossless and universally accepted by editors and design tools.
- Sending to someone with old software? → PNG (or JPG). Old desktop apps (pre-2020) may not open WebP.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature |
PNG |
WebP |
| Compression |
Lossless (large files) |
Lossy or lossless (small files) |
| Typical size for a 1000×667 photo |
~1.2 MB |
~0.3–0.4 MB at q85 |
| Transparency (alpha) |
✅ Yes |
✅ Yes |
| Animation |
❌ No (use APNG) |
✅ Yes |
| Browser support |
Universal |
All modern browsers |
| Opens in old editors |
✅ Yes |
⚠️ Sometimes not |
For photos, WebP at quality 85–90 looks identical to the PNG on screen while being roughly a third of the size. For flat graphics (logos, screenshots with sharp edges), the gap narrows but WebP still wins.
When PNG is still the right choice
- Working files. If you will crop, retouch or re-export the image later, keep the PNG. Every WebP re-export at quality <100 loses a little detail.
- Screenshots with tiny text. Lossy compression can blur 1-pixel text. PNG keeps it razor sharp.
- Maximum compatibility. Some scanners, printers and legacy software only accept PNG/JPG.
When WebP clearly wins
- Website speed and SEO. Google's Core Web Vitals reward smaller files. Converting your PNGs to WebP is one of the cheapest performance wins available — often cutting total page weight by 20–30%.
- Image-heavy pages. Galleries, e-commerce listings and portfolios: hundreds of images × 60% smaller each adds up fast.
- Storage. Photo libraries shrink dramatically without visible loss.
How to convert (free and private)
The safest way is a tool that runs in your browser — your images never leave your device:
Quality settings that work
- Quality 90 — visually identical, the safe default for most images.
- Quality 80–85 — maximum savings for photos where slight softness is acceptable.
- Quality 100 / lossless — when every pixel matters; the file stays smaller than PNG anyway thanks to WebP's better lossless codec.
Common misconceptions
- "WebP loses transparency" — false. WebP supports full alpha transparency, including semi-transparent shadows.
- "WebP is not supported anymore" — the opposite: it is now served by the majority of websites and supported everywhere that matters.
- "Converting makes quality worse every time" — only if you re-export repeatedly at low quality. Always convert from the original.
Bottom line
Keep PNG as your archival/working format, ship WebP to the web. A simple workflow: store PNGs, convert to WebP at quality 90 when publishing — you keep quality, cut bandwidth, and your pages load measurably faster.